SHERIDAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
2003 – 2004
Education, One
Student at a Time
MISSION: Sheridan School works with home and community to promote the development of each child’s ability to internalize discipline, motivation, creativity, esteem, and responsibility. Sheridan challenges the student to reach his/her highest academic potential to prepare for a productive life.
CHILDREN’S MISSION:
Sheridan
Has Achieving
Responsible Kind Students.
(SHARKS)
VISION: Each Sheridan School student will be an engaged learner working at or beyond his/her ability.
1.
We believe all children can learn and be
successful.
2.
We believe that the diversity of our
population is a strength
and
asset.
3.
We believe that learning happens in many
different ways.
4.
We believe that accelerated learning helps
students enjoy
school and achieve.
5.
We believe that children must learn to
think and apply
critical thinking skills in problem solving
situations.
6.
We believe children need to work and play
harmoniously
together.
7.
We believe that the school must promote
family partnerships
to enhance and enrich educational
experiences for children.
All
parents care and desire good school programs for their
children.
8.
We believe that the exit outcomes for our
students are the
net
result of all the staff that has worked with each
student.
Sheridan Elementary School
II. School Improvement Plan
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 1: All students will improve reading skills
Grade: K
|
Interventions |
Activities to
Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will increase their vocabulary by building upon prior
knowledge Students will develop and apply phonemic awareness /
phonics Students will develop and apply reading
strategies |
Rhyming Beginning & Ending Sounds Read Alouds After school Intervention Finger plays, songs / nursery
rhymes Title Intervention Kindergarten use of Houghton Mifflin Summer Programs |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Blue Journal Assessment -Teacher Observation -PALS Screening |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Gifted Grant -Reading Grant -Title I Grant -Title II Grant -IWU and ISU students |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Obtaining implied and personal meaning throughout all genres
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 1: All students will improve reading skills
Grade: 1
|
Interventions |
Activities to
Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will increase their vocabulary by building upon prior
knowledge Students will develop and apply phonemic
awareness / phonics Students will develop and apply reading
strategies |
Making Words Picture & Word
Sorts Higher Level
Questioning Practice Leveled Readers After school Tutoring Title Intervention Word Walls Read Alouds Summer Programs Use of Leveled Readers |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests --Terra Nova
Standardized Test -Running Records -Teacher Observations |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Gifted Grant -Reading Grant -Title I Grant -Title II Grant -IWU and ISU students |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Obtaining implied and personal meaning throughout all genres
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 1: All students will improve reading skills
Grade: 2
|
Interventions |
Activities to
Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will increase their vocabulary by building upon prior
knowledge Students will develop and apply phonemic
awareness / phonics Students will develop and apply reading
strategies |
Partner Reading Reading Counts Activities to help
students draw conclusions and inference After school programs Leveled Readers Word Walls Read Alouds Title Intervention Use of Leveled Readers |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests --Terra Nova
Standardized Test -Running Records -Reading Counts |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Gifted Grant -Reading Grant -Title I Grant -Title II Grant -IWU and ISU students |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Obtaining implied and personal meaning throughout all genres
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 1: All students will improve reading skills
Grade: 3
|
Interventions |
Activities to
Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will increase their vocabulary by building upon prior
knowledge Students will develop and apply skills Students will develop and apply reading
strategies Students will
develop comprehension skills and improve their ability to draw conclusions
and inference |
Reading Counts Home Reading
Connection Reading Log After School Program Word Walls Early
Start Summer Bridges Incorporate spelling activities Use of Leveled Readers |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) -Terra Nova
Standardized Test -Running Records -Scholastic Reading
Inventory -Reading Counts |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Gifted Grant -Reading Grant -Title I Grant -Title II Grant -IWU and ISU students |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Obtaining implied and personal meaning throughout all genres
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 1: All students will improve reading skills
Grade: 4
|
Interventions
|
Activities to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time
Line Start
End |
Evidence of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development |
|
|
Students will increase their vocabulary by building upon prior
knowledge Students will develop and apply skills Students will develop and apply reading
strategies Students will
develop comprehension skills and improve their ability to draw conclusions and
inference |
Comprehension
Activities Author Studies Genre of the Month Use of Vocabulary
Dictionary Use of Leveled Readers After School Program Word Walls Summer
Programs |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) -Terra Nova
Standardized Test -Running Records -Scholastic Reading
Inventory -Reading Counts |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Gifted Grant -Reading Grant -Title I Grant -Title II Grant -IWU and ISU students |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Obtaining implied and personal meaning throughout all genres
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 1: All students
will improve reading skills
Grade: 5
|
Interventions |
Activities to
Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will increase their vocabulary by building upon prior
knowledge Students will develop and apply skills Students will develop and apply reading
strategies Students will
develop comprehension skills and improve their ability to draw conclusions
and inference |
Use of Reading Counts Use of written
responses in each theme of reading series Use of Leveled Readers After School Program Word Walls
Summer Programs |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) -Terra Nova
Standardized Test -Running Records -Scholastic Reading Inventory -Reading Counts |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Gifted Grant -Reading Grant -Title I Grant -Title II Grant -IWU and ISU students |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Obtaining implied and personal meaning throughout all genres
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 2: All students
will increase their writing
Grade: K skills in a variety of contexts
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will write fluently using a variety of styles Students will learn and apply correct writing
conventions |
Develop Portfolios / Journals Use Daily Oral Language activities |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Local Writing Tests
with rubrics |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Title I Grant -Title II -IWU and ISU students -Volunteers |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Clearly communicate written thoughts to varied audiences
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 2: All students will increase their writing
Grade: 1 skills in a variety of contexts
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will write fluently using a variety of styles Students will learn and apply correct writing
conventions |
Develop Portfolios / Journals Use Daily Oral Language activities |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Local Writing Tests
with rubrics |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Title I Grant -Title II -IWU and ISU students -Volunteers |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Clearly communicate written thoughts to varied audiences
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 2: All students
will increase their writing
Grade: 2 skills in a variety of contexts
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will write fluently using a variety of styles Students will learn and apply correct writing
conventions |
Develop Portfolios / Journals Use Daily Oral Language activities |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Local Writing Tests
with rubrics |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Title I Grant -Title II -IWU and ISU students -Volunteers |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Clearly communicate written thoughts to varied audiences
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 2: All students will increase their writing
Grade: 3 skills in a variety of contexts
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will write fluently using a variety of styles Students will learn and apply correct writing
conventions |
Develop Portfolios / Journals Hamburger writing Use Daily Oral Language activities |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Illinois Standards
Achievement Test (ISAT) -Local Writing Tests
with rubrics |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Title I Grant -Title II -IWU and ISU students -Volunteers |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Clearly communicate written thoughts to varied audiences
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 2: All students will increase their writing
Grade: 4 skills in a variety of contexts
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will write fluently using a variety of styles Students will learn and apply correct writing
conventions |
Develop Portfolios / Journals Use Daily Oral Language activities |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Illinois Standards
Achievement Test (ISAT) -Local Writing Tests
with rubrics |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Title I Grant -Title II -IWU and ISU students -Volunteers |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Clearly communicate written thoughts to varied audiences
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP Target Goal: Literacy Student Performance Goal 2: All students will increase their writing
Grade: 5 skills in a variety of contexts
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will write fluently using a variety of styles Students will learn and apply correct writing
conventions |
Develop Portfolios / Journals Use Daily Oral Language activities |
Teachers and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Houghton Mifflin
Integrated Theme Tests -Illinois Standards
Achievement Test (ISAT) -Local Writing Tests
with rubrics |
-District Textbook fund -District budget -Title I Grant -Title II -IWU and ISU students -Volunteers |
See Attached |
Essence of the goal:
Clearly communicate written thoughts to varied audiences
|
|||||||
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP
Target Goal:
Thinking
/ Reasoning / Math / Study Skills
Student
Performance Goal 3:
All students will improve and develop
thinking /
reasoning
/ study skills / problem solving
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will use thinking, reasoning, and study
skills in all subject areas Students will participate in activities to develop character |
District math vocabulary lists will be used Use of planner with classrooms Do activities based upon Character Counts Calendar Acts Graphic Organizers Logic Posters Integrated Theme Tests |
SIP Teacher and Staff |
2002 5 Year
Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Blue Journal Assessment -Teacher Observation |
-District
Textbook fund -District
budget -Title
II -Volunteers -State
Farm grants |
See Attached |
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP
Target Goal:
Thinking
/ Reasoning / Math / Study Skills
Student Performance Goal 3: All students will
improve and develop thinking / reasoning / study skills / problem solving
Grade:
1
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will use thinking, reasoning, and study
skills in all subject areas Students will participate in activities to develop character |
Math vocabulary lists will be used Use of planner in class Character Counts Listening Skills Conflict Resolution Graphic Organizers Making inferences Use of charts, graphs,
tables Reading longer passages and finding answers |
SIP Teacher and Staff |
2002 5 Year
Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Teacher
Observations -Terra
Nova Standardized Test |
-District
Textbook fund -District
budget -Title
II -Volunteers -State
Farm grants |
See Attached |
Sheridan Elementary
School
NCA/SIP
Target Goal:
Thinking
/ Reasoning / Math / Study Skills
Student
Performance Goal 3: All students will improve and develop thinking / reasoning /
study skills / problem solving
Grade:
2
|
Interventions |
Activities
to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time Line Start End |
Evidence
of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development
|
|
|
Students will use thinking, reasoning, and study
skills in all subject areas Students will participate in activities to develop character |
Math vocabulary lists will be used Use of planner with classrooms Character Counts Drawing pictures to
solve problems Utilize Read It – Draw It – Solve It strategy Simulated test
situations with Reading Counts Practice checking
answers |
SIP Teacher and Staff |
2002 5 Year
Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Teacher
Observations -Terra
Nova Standardized Test |
-District
Textbook fund -District
budget -Title
II -Volunteers -State
Farm grants |
See Attached |
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP
Target Goal:
Thinking
/ Reasoning / Math / Study Skills
Student Performance Goal 3: All students will improve and develop
thinking /
Grade:
3 reasoning
/ study skills / problem solving
|
Interventions
|
Activities to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time
Line Start
End |
Evidence of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development |
|
|
Students will use thinking, reasoning, and study
skills in all subject areas Students will participate in activities to develop character |
District math vocabulary lists will be used Use of planner with classrooms Character Counts Practice extended
response Activities with
drawing solutions Reading Counts Use of Graphic Organizers |
SIP Teacher and Staff |
2002 5 Year
Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) -Terra Nova Standardized Test -Teacher Checklist |
-District
Textbook fund -District
budget -Title
II -Volunteers -State
Farm grants |
See Attached |
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP
Target Goal:
Thinking
/ Reasoning / Math / Study Skills
Student Performance Goal 3: All students will improve and develop thinking
/
Grade:
4 reasoning
/ study skills / problem solving
|
Interventions
|
Activities to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time
Line Start
End |
Evidence of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development |
|
|
Students will use thinking, reasoning, and study
skills in all subject areas Students will participate in activities to develop character |
District math vocabulary lists will be used Use of planner with classrooms Character Counts KQS Charts in Social Studies and
Science Use of more problem solving strategies Practice with context
clues within text Selective Underlining Graphic Organizers |
SIP Teacher and Staff |
2002 5 Year Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Illinois
Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) -Terra
Nova Standardized Test -Reading Counts / SRI |
-District
Textbook fund -District
budget -Title
II -Volunteers -State
Farm grants |
See Attached |
Sheridan Elementary School
NCA/SIP
Target Goal:
Thinking
/ Reasoning / Math / Study Skills
Student Performance Goal 3: All students will improve and develop
thinking /
Grade:
5 reasoning
/ study skills / problem solving
|
Interventions
|
Activities to Implement |
Person Responsible |
Time
Line Start
End |
Evidence of Attainment |
Resources/ Budget |
Professional Development |
|
|
Students will use thinking, reasoning, and study
skills in all subject areas Students will participate in activities to develop character |
Math vocabulary lists will be used Use of planner with classrooms Character Counts Practice with
identifying problems Diagram / organize
solutions Narrative of solutions Selective Highlighting
|
SIP Teacher and Staff |
2002 5 Year
Plan |
2006 5 Year Plan |
-Illinois Standards Achievement
Test (ISAT) -Terra Nova Standardized Test -Reading Counts -SRI |
-District
Textbook fund -District
budget -Title
II -Volunteers -State
Farm grants |
See Attached |
Fall 2002 – Spring 2003
SHERIDAN SCHOOL
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE OF ATTAINMENT
2002-2003
KINDERGARTEN – Goal 1 – All students will improve
reading skills.
The Phonological Awareness and Literacy Screening
(PALS) was administered in the fall and spring of the 2002 – 2003 school year
to all kindergarten students. The
screenings measured rhyme awareness, beginning sound awareness, alphabet
knowledge, and letter-sound knowledge.
A raw score of 74 for the spring test is a good predictor of future
reading success. The 2002 – 2003
kindergarten class had 47.5 % of the students meet the threshold of 74. Raw scores increased from an average of 49.6
in the fall to 72.7 in the spring.
Eleven of our students who attended remedial summer programs at Sheridan
scored 74 or better at the end of the summer to bring the total percentage of
students who scored at or above 74 to 62.5 %. Another measure of kindergarten
achievement is the Terra Nova testing administered to first grade students in
the fall of the year. The Fall 2002
test provides information on our kindergarten students from last year. 58 % of our 2001 – 2002 kindergarten
students were at or above the 4th stanine on the reading portion of
the Terra Nova test.
KINDERGARTEN – Goal 2 – All students will improve
writing skills.
The majority of students will be able to focus on a
main idea, order events when telling a story, and use symbols and letters to
represent print. Our current portfolios
are used to assess ordering pictures to tell a story, dictating sentences about
pictures and using symbols and letters to express themselves two times a year.
Students have extensive opportunities to write in journals during their
kindergarten year. We have established
a rubric for scoring the writing samples. We will continue to record these
skills as data with which we can compare future data.
KINDERGARTEN – Goal 3 –
All students will improve thinking / math reasoning / problem solving skills /
study skills.
Our current portfolios assess number recognition,
set building and ordering to 12, rote counting to 30, sorting and patterning
concepts, basic calendar skills and basic geometry concepts three times a year.
We will continue to record these skills as data with which we can compare
future data. We also measure
kindergarten achievement on the Terra Nova test administered to first grade
students in the fall of the year. The
Fall 2002 test provides information on our kindergarten students from last
year. 57 % of our 2001 – 2002
kindergarten students were at or above the 4th stanine on the math
portion of the Terra Nova test.
SHERIDAN SCHOOL
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE OF ATTAINMENT
2002-2003
FIRST GRADE – Goal 1 – All students will improve
their reading skills across the curriculum.
The Terra Nova Test results (given in the fall of 2nd
grade) from the 2002-2003 school year show 68 % of the students entering 2nd
grade were achieving at the 4th stanine
or above. The Fall 2002 test provides
information on our first grade students from last year. The comparison of our fall and spring first
grade Terra Nova scores shows an increase from 58 % students in the fall at the
4th stanine to 81 % of the students in the spring at or above the 4th
stanine. The majority of our students
are showing positive growth in all areas. We need to continue to focus on
phonics/decoding and reading strategies to maintain positive growth.
FIRST GRADE – Goal 2 – All students will improve
writing skills across the curriculum.
The Terra Nova test results (given in the fall of 2nd
grade) from the 2002-2003 school year show 67% of the students entering 2nd
grade were achieving at the 4th
stanine or above in language. The comparison of our fall and spring first
grade Terra Nova scores shows an increase from 69 % students in the fall at or
above the 4th stanine to 87 % of the students at or above the 4th
stanine. We have been using the
District Writing Rubric to evaluate student’s writing to determine growth. The majority of our students are showing
positive growth in all areas. We will continue to focus on writing strategies
including sequencing and complete sentences with correct punctuation and
capitalization.
FIRST GRADE – Goal 3 –
All students will improve thinking / math reasoning / problem solving skills /
study skills.
The Terra Nova test
results (given in the fall of 2nd grade) from the 2002-2003 school
year show 55% of the students entering 2nd grade were achieving at
the 4th stanine or above.
The comparison of our fall and spring first grade Terra Nova scores
shows an increase from 54 % students in the fall at or above the 4th
stanine to 64 % of the students at or above the 4th stanine. The majority of our students are showing
positive growth on the Terra Nova tests. We need to continue to focus on
problem solving, computation strategies and number sense.
SHERIDAN SCHOOL
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE OF ATTAINMENT
2002-2003
SECOND
GRADE – Goal 1 – All students
will improve reading skills across the curriculum.
The 3rd Grade Terra Nova results from
2002-2003 show 53 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine. The comparison of our fall and
spring second grade Terra Nova scores shows an increase from 68 % students in
the fall at the 4th stanine to 89 % of the students at or above the
4th stanine. Analysis of
this data shows that our reading program is addressing the needs of our
students. We will continue to focus on decoding, comprehension (literal
comprehension and inferences) and vocabulary skills.
SECOND
GRADE – Goal 2 – All
students will improve writing skills across the curriculum.
The 3rd grade Terra Nova results from
2002-2003 show 67 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th stanine
in language. The comparison of our fall
and spring first grade Terra Nova scores shows an increase from 67 % students
in the fall at the 4th stanine to 86 % of the students at or above
the 4th stanine. A
district-wide rubric will be used to assess the same writing prompt two times a
year. The scores will show improvement over the course of the year. Use of the district-wide rubric will
determine the strengths and weaknesses of the students in the area of writing.
SECOND GRADE – Goal 3 – All students will improve thinking / math reasoning /
problem solving skills / study skills.
The 3rd grade Terra Nova results from
2002-2003 show 56 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine. The comparison of our fall and
spring first grade Terra Nova scores shows an increase from 58 % students in
the fall at the 4th stanine to 80.6 % of the students at or above
the 4th stanine. Analysis of
this data shows that our math program is addressing the needs of our students.
We will continue to focus on the Illinois State Standards.
SHERIDAN SCHOOL
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE OF ATTAINMENT
2002-2003
THIRD
GRADE – Goal 1 - All
students will improve reading skills across the curriculum.
The 4th Grade Terra Nova results from Fall
2002-2003 show 74 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine. The Terra Nova results showed
relative strengths in comparing, contrasting, and predicting. However, marked deficiencies were noted
comprehension, story elements, and vocabulary strategies. The ISAT performance
2002-2003 as reported in the Illinois School Report Card for Sheridan School
reports that students at 3rd grade meeting or exceeding the
standards are as follows: 3rd grade Sheridan students at 37.8%,
District 73% and State at 62%. The ISAT
results showed relative strengths in vocabulary and word analysis, and marked
deficiencies in informational sources and inferences. In 2003-2004 we will provide a variety of reading activities
through various materials to increase reading skills. Higher level questioning
will be used to provide a purpose for reading. We will continue to focus on
decoding, comprehension (literal comprehension and inferences) and vocabulary
skills.
THIRD
GRADE – Goal 2 – All
students will improve writing skills across the curriculum.
The ISAT performance 2002-2003 as reported on the
Illinois School Report Card for Sheridan School reports that students at 3rd
grade meeting or exceeding the standards are as follows in writing: 3rd grade Sheridan
students 35.9%, District 60.1% and State 60.1%. The 4th grade Terra Nova results from 2002-2003 show
86 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th stanine in
language. Through a variety of styles
of writing, all students from the lower achiever to the academically talented,
will be able to extend the basic 3rd grade writing requirements.
Using these various styles of writing, the students will produce higher quality
writing samples.
THIRD GRADE – Goal 3 – All students will improve thinking / math reasoning / problem
solving skills / study skills.
The 4th grade Terra Nova results from
2002-2003 show 67 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine. The ISAT performance 2002-2003
as reported on the Illinois School Report Card for Sheridan School reports that
students at 3rd grade meeting or exceeding the standards are as
follows in math: 3rd grade Sheridan students 69.1%, District 84.1%
and State 75.7%. Our focus for
2003-2004 will be to strengthen our extensions for our higher achieving
students while maintaining the skills and strategies of the lower to middle
achieving students.
SHERIDAN SCHOOL
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE OF ATTAINMENT
2002-2003
FOURTH
GRADE – Goal 1 –All
students will improve reading skills across the curriculum.
The 5th Grade Terra Nova results from
Fall 2002-2003 show 54 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine. The Terra Nova results showed
relative strengths in comparing, contrasting, and predicting. However, marked deficiencies continued to be
noted in comprehension, story elements, and vocabulary strategies. In 2003-2004
we will provide a variety of reading activities through various materials to
increase reading skills. Higher level questioning will be used to provide a
purpose for reading. We will continue to focus on decoding, comprehension
(literal comprehension and inferences) and vocabulary skills.
FOURTH GRADE – Goal 2 – All students will improve
writing skills across the curriculum.
The 5th grade Terra Nova results from
2002-2003 show 64 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine in language. A district wide
writing rubric was used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of all
students.
FOURTH GRADE – Goal 3 –
All students will improve thinking / math reasoning / problem solving skills /
study skills.
The 4th grade Terra Nova results from
2002-2003 show 72 % of the students scoring at or above the 4th
stanine in math. The ISAT performance
for results for math cannot be evaluated because the only areas assessed at the
fourth grade level are science and social studies. Many thinking / reasoning /
problem solving skills are assessed in the ISAT science and social studies
results so it is appropriate to discuss these results here. The ISAT performance 2002-2003 as reported
on the Illinois School Report Card for Sheridan School reports that students at
4th grade meeting or exceeding the standards are as follows in
science: 4th grade Sheridan students 54.7%, District 74.5% and State
66.5%. The ISAT performance 2002-2003 as reported on the Illinois School Report
Card for Sheridan School reports that students at 4th grade meeting
or exceeding the standards are as follows in social studies: 4th
grade Sheridan students 56.3%, District 72.7% and State 62.8%. Emphasis for
2003-2004 will be to use our problem-solving rubric for all students at fourth
grade. Within this rubric, we will use extensions of the problem for our higher
achievers.
SHERIDAN SCHOOL
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE OF ATTAINMENT
2002-2003
FIFTH
GRADE – Goal 1 – All
students will improve reading skills across the curriculum.
The Terra Nova test results cannot be evaluated
because of the unavailability of our scores from our current 6th
graders who were former Sheridan students.
The ISAT performance 2002-2003 as reported in the Illinois School Report
Card for Sheridan School reports that students at 5th grade meeting
or exceeding the standards are as follows: 5th grade Sheridan
students at 34.4 %, District 61.1 % and State at 60.4 %. The ISAT results showed a relative strength
in vocabulary and marked deficiencies in informational sources and
inferences. In 2003-2004 we will
provide a variety of reading activities through various materials to increase
reading skills. Higher level questioning will be used to provide a purpose for
reading. We will continue to focus on decoding, comprehension (literal
comprehension and inferences) and vocabulary skills.
FIFTH
GRADE – Goal 2 – All
students will improve writing skills across the curriculum.
The ISAT performance 2002-2003 as reported on the
Illinois School Report Card for Sheridan School reports that students at 5th
grade meeting or exceeding the standards are as follows in writing: 5th
grade Sheridan students 37.8 %, District 58.7 % and State 64.9 %. Through a variety of styles of writing, all
students from the lower achiever to the academically talented, will be able to
extend the basic 5th grade writing requirements. Using these various
styles of writing, the students will produce higher quality writing samples.
FIFTH GRADE – Goal 3 – All students will improve thinking / math reasoning /
problem solving skills / study skills.
The Terra Nova test results cannot be evaluated
because of the unavailability of our scores from 6th grade former
Sheridan students. The ISAT performance 2002-2003 as reported on the Illinois
School Report Card for Sheridan School reports that students at 5th
grade meeting or exceeding the standards are as follows in math: 3rd
grade Sheridan students 55.5 %, District 77.3 % and
State 68.3 %. Our focus for 2003-2004
will be to strengthen our extensions for our higher achieving students while
maintaining the skills and strategies of the lower to middle achieving
students. All Sheridan School math
scores in geometric concepts and relationships and measurement were relative
strengths exceed the district and state scores. We need to continue to focus on estimation, data organization and
analysis, probability, algebraic patterns, variables and relationships.
Training – Goal 1 (Reading)
|
|
|
All Staff |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
14 |
|
7 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
All Staff |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Training –
Goal 2 (Writing) |
|
|
1. Writing
Training & Tech Burning |
1 1 |
|
2. NCA 3 Yr.
Cycle Training |
1 |
|
3. Grade Level Meeting 1 & 2 Writing |
1 |
|
4. Writing
Rubrics, Assessment |
All Staff |
|
5. Writing
(ideas, state expectations) |
All Staff |
|
6. Writing
Backmapping |
K-5 Staff |
|
7. ISU Writing
Course |
1 |
|
8. Apple
Learning Series (Writing, Math, Tech) |
1 |
Training – Goal 3 (Thinking /
Reasoning / Math / Study Skills)
|
|
|
1. Ruby Moments
at regularly scheduled Faculty Meetings |
All Staff |
|
2. New Teacher
Orientation |
6 |
|
3. Changing
Demographics Cadre |
8 |
|
4. Ruby Payne –
Learning Styles Workshop |
1 |
|
5. Use of Agenda
Book Inservice |
All Staff |
Addendum
to School Improvement Plan for Sheridan School - 2003-2004
A. The
comprehensive plan for the school wide Title I program includes all of the
eight components required:
Program Requirements and Legal References
|
Indicators
of Compliance |
|
All eligible schools
and parents have been informed concerning the statue, rules, and regulations
authorizing school-wide programs. P.L. 107-110, Section
1112(c)(1)(A). |
|
|
The LEA has provided, and
will continue to provide, technical assistance and support to the school-wide
programs. P.L. 107-110, Section
112 (c)(1)(B).
|
|
|
Each school
participating as a School-wide Program under Title 1, Part A has developed a
School-wide Plan in consultation with the LEA and its school support team or
other technical assistance provided under section 1117. P.L. 107-1110, Section
1114(b)(2) |
|
|
The comprehensive plan
developed by each school-wide program school has been developed during a
one-year period, unless the LEA, after considering the recommendation of the
technical assistance providers under section 1117, determines that
less time is needed to develop and implement the school-wide program; or the
school is operating a school-wide program on the day preceding the date on
enactment of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, but shall develop amendments to
its existing plan during the first year of assistance after that date to
reflect the provisions of this section. P.L. 107-110, Section 1114(b)(2)(B). |
|
|
Each school-wide program plan addressed each of the
following components: |
|
|
A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire
school that’s based on information which includes the achievement of students
in relation to the state academic content standards and the state student
academic achievement standards. |
|
|
School-wide reform strategies that: √
Provide opportunities for all students to meet the state’s proficient and
advance levels of student academic achievement; √ Use effective methods and instructional
strategies that are based on scientifically based research that- ◊ strengthen the
core academic program in the school: ◊ increase the
amount and quality of learning time, such as providing an extended school
year, before-and-after school programs, and summer programs and
opportunities, and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum; and ◊ include
strategies for meeting the educational needs of historically underserved
populations. √ Include strategies to address the needs
of all students in the school, but particularly the needs of low-achieving
students and those at-risk of not meeting the state student academic
achievement standards who are members of the target population of any program
that is included in the school-wide program; and address how the school will
determine if such needs have been met; and √ Are consistent with, and are designed to
implement, the state and local improvement plans, if any. |
|
|
Instruction by highly qualified professional
teachers; |
|
|
In accordance with section 1119 and section
1114(a)(4), high quality and ongoing professional development for teachers,
principals, and paraprofessionals and, if appropriate, pupil services
personnel, parents, and other staff to enable all children at the school to
meet the state’s student achievement standards; |
|
|
Strategies to increase parental involvement in
accordance with section 1118, such as family literacy services; |
|
|
Strategies to attract high-quality, highly
qualified teachers to high need schools; |
|
|
Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition
from early childhood programs, such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading
First, or a state-run preschool program, to local elementary school programs. |
|
|
Measures to include teachers in the decisions
regarding the use of academic assessments described in section 1111(b)(3) in
order to provide information, and to improve, the academic achievement of
individual students, and the overall instructional program; |
|
|
Activities to ensure that students who experience
difficulty mastering the proficient or advanced levels of academic
achievement standards required by section 111(b))1) must be provided with
effective, timely additional assistance which shall include measures to
ensure that students’ difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to
provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance; |
|
|
Coordination and integration of federal, state
and local services and programs, including-
√programs supported under this Act
√violence prevention programs
√nutrition programs
√housing programs
√Head Start
√adult education
√vocational and technical
√job training P.L. 107-110, Section 1114(b)(1). |
|
Each
school-wide program plan-
Describe how the school will implement the 10
school-wide components; Describe how the school will use Title I, part A
resources and other resources to implement those components; Includes a list of state and LEA programs and
other federal programs that will be included in the school-wide program; Describes how the school will provide individual
student academic assessment results in a language the parents can understand,
including an interpretation of those results, to the parents of a child who
participates in the academic assessments required by section 1111(b)(3). P.L. 107-1110, Section 1114(b)(2)(A). |
|
|
Each school-wide program plan was developed with
the involvement of parents and other members of the community to be served
and individuals who will carry out the plan, including teachers, principals,
and administrators, including administrators of other Title I programs, and
if appropriate, pupil services personnel, technical assistance providers,
school staff, and, if plan relates to secondary school, students from such
school. P.L. 107-110,
section 1114(b)(2)(B) |
|
|
The school-wide program plan will be in effect
during the school’s participation under Title 1, Part A and reviewed and
revised, as necessary, by the school. P.L. 107-110, Section 1114(b)(2)(B). |
|
|
The school-wide program plan is available to the
LEA, parents, and the public, and the information contained in the plan is in
an understandable and uniform format and, to the extent practicable, provided
in a language that the parents can understand. P.L. 107-110, Section 1114(B)(2)(B). |
|
|
The school-wide program, if appropriate, was
developed in coordination will program under Reading First, Early Reading
First, Even Start, Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technique Education Act of
1998, and the Head Start Act. P.L. 107-110, Section 1114(b)(2)(B). |
|